Reimagine
University College

A human-centered approach to designing continuing higher education at WashU

An interdisciplinary design team, which included seven WashU students, spent the 2019-20 academic year working to understand both the current and potential future role of University College in the St. Louis region. University College is the university’s largest continuing education program. With its potential shift to an independent school, this project aimed to investigate how it might better serve working adults in the region. Pilots and prototypes generated through their research will manifest in novel University College programming, with implementation beginning in Fall 2020.

image image
“After being a part of this project, I’m even more confident that I want to pursue design research as a career. It was an incredible opportunity to get hands-on experience in a field I’m interested in and confirm that it’s the work I want to do post-grad.”
- Jane Gormley
image

Overview

Objective Redesign Washington University’s University College program to better fit the needs and aspirations of working adults in the St. Louis region, thereby increasing economic mobility and equity in the metropolitan area.
Field Human-Centered Design Research, Human Centered Design, Service Design
Duration 8 months
Partner Public Design Bureau

Disclaimer

All materials and information on this portfolio, including touch points and frameworks, are concepts and not currently implemented at University College.

Meet the Team

Students studying a variety of subjects across campus came together to work on this project.

Click on the links below to explore their personal experiences.

  • Carrie Phillips
  • B.A. American Culture Studies
  • Nathaniel Rodriguez
  • B.S. Electrical Engineering
  • Jane Gormley
  • B.A. Sociology
  • Anya Pawar
  • B.A. Communication Design
  • Victoria Grace
  • B.A. International & Area Studies
  • Cheryl Kao
  • B.F.A. Communication Design
  • Afton Anderson
  • M.A. in Biology
  • Liz Kramer / Project Lead
  • Associate Director
  • Annemarie Spitz / Senior Researcher
  • Lecturer

Explore Our Process

Phase 1: Discovery and Planning

To begin the project, we conducted secondary research to gain a better understanding of the problem space, existing benchmarks, and important stakeholders. This allowed us to narrow the scope of the project to three major industries (health, data, and change) and identify an audience to focus on (those looking to advance or switch in their careers).

Initial Research, Stakeholder Research and Analysis

  • Conducted literature review and background research.
  • Researched stakeholders and assisted with prioritization for interviews.
  • Created frameworks for analyzing local benchmarks.
  • Synthesized stakeholder interviews conducted by UCollege staff.

phase 1

Participant Recruitment

  • Conducted phone screenings with potential participants.
  • Designed participant recruitment ads for Facebook.
  • Scheduled interviews with 21 participants.

phase 1

Phase 2: Audience Research

In this phase, we spoke with a diverse set of working adults in the St. Louis area to gain insights on their experiences. These data points were then synthesized into themes that helped inform the concepts created in later phases.

Audience Research

  • Assisted with creation of interview guide.
  • Documented and led 90-minute, one-on-one interviews with St. Louis residents either looking to advance or switch in their current career path.
  • Transcribed and prepared interviews for synthesis.

phase 1

Synthesis

  • Participated in synthesis work sessions, identifying themes and patterns from audience sessions.
  • Assisted with creation of videos and presentations to summarize findings and illustrate the details of each interview participant’s background.

phase 1

Phase 3: Ideation

Using the insights from our audience research to establish context, we facilitated brainstorming sessions to solicit concepts from stakeholders. These were then organized and used to establish a base for later prototyping.

Ideation Sessions

  • Facilitated and assisted in 6 ideation sessions with faculty, staff, and current/potential students.
  • Engaged in prioritization sessions with faculty, staff, and current/potential students.

phase 1

Phase 4: Prototypes

In this final stage, we created increasingly detailed prototypes of possible programs. We tested them with stakeholders to receive feedback that has informed our final recommendations.

Create and Test Storyboards

  • Designed icons for use in storyboard development.
  • Created visuals for three rounds of narrative storyboards used in testing sessions.
  • Conducted user testing.

phase 1

Create and Test Touchpoints

  • Created higher-fidelity touchpoints.
  • Iterated touchpoints to ensure clarity and comprehension for the final round of user testing<./li>
  • Conducted user testing.

phase 1

Develop Final Concept Reports

  • Synthesized feedback from all user sessions.
  • Assisted in designing, writing, and compiling final recommendations for WashU and University College leadership.

phase 1

Reflection

The first day I walked into the January Hall conference room, I felt intense gratitude to be a part of this team. The folks I work with are some of the kindest, hardest working, most innovative WashU has to offer. Our disciplines span ArtSci, McKelvey, Sam Fox- making for a truly interdisciplinary convergence of thought and experiences.

Carrie

When we applied for the Reimagine UCollege project in early August, it’s safe to say we didn’t really know what we were getting ourselves into. We found a common thread in our commitment to design thinking methodologies and equity in the St. Louis region, yet the extent of our involvement was then a mystery. Some of us anticipated intern-type responsibilities that were meaningful, but nevertheless regarded as background work. Some of us didn’t know what to anticipate at all. On day one, however, an exciting precedent was set. Project Lead Liz Kramer explained to us that our curiosity could very much guide our engagement with the research, which set the stage for an atmosphere of encouragement and risk taking. Every team member was positively surprised by the trust and agency bestowed upon us from the get-go. Liz and Annemarie regarded us as learners but also as professional consultants, which instilled in us a confidence that allowed us to make immediate leaps into interviews, ad design, and benchmarking (To this day, we still marvel at the fact that we found ourselves leading 90 minute interviews within weeks of beginning work… a risky move? You’d have to ask our Leads).

The roles I play would shift rapidly. One minute, I would be synthesizing information and generating trends, and the next minute I would be facilitating (or notetaking for) an interview! Afterwards, we would return to our “researcher” roles by debriefing on our new information.

Nate
image

It quickly became evident that we had a valuable seat at the table. And this seat exposed us to more than any of us could have imagined. In addition to big picture work, we were immersed in the intricacies of project scheduling and organization; survey and interview recruitment; regional workforce data; and integration of landscape research with interview feedback.

Human-centered design work is inherently loose in structure, driven by emotion, and complicated in nature. I learned that having a system in place that will counter these tendencies to get lost in the process is a necessity.

Anya

We marveled at our conference room filled wall to wall with sticky notes, data points, and sketches. And because our roles were so active, these walls teemed with life! We persistently drew upon the stories revealed to us through interviews and surveys: A conversation with a single mother trying to set an example for her daughter through her pursuit of higher education. A server who dreams of a doctorate that will allow her to start a nonprofit for St. Louis youth. A gentleman in his 50s who’s working full time yet taking classes to figure out what he wants to be when he grows up. Conversations that put the human in human-centered design, and consistently renewed our motivation to remain fully invested in the process.

I learned the difference between creating a solution for a community and creating a solution with a community and the emphasis that each design approach takes.

Nate

As prototypes for University College programming begin to take shape, we find ourselves asking: Where does the project go from here? Where do we go from here? One thing is certain: we are incredibly excited to see pilot programs implemented in Fall 2020, and cannot wait to hear how roots begin to form, guided by student and University feedback. WashU has opened up countless opportunities for us, this team being one of them, so we are heartened and grateful to have played even a small role in expanding opportunities for future students - particularly the region’s working adults. As for our future? Some of us are particularly interested in UX design; others, the intersection of design and technology, all of us, continuing to apply design thinking and human-centered methodologies to all we do.

image

Perhaps our greatest hope going forth is that WashU continues to include students like us in projects that take on complex questions at the institutional scale. We cannot underscore the value of student involvement enough in promoting personal and professional growth, and deepening investment in both the University and St. Louis. To our supervisors, to Chancellor Martin, to WashU: you have given us confidence, invaluable design skills, and a genuine capacity to enact change in our region.


Acknowledgements

We wish to express appreciation to the many staff and faculty that offered their discussions, communications, and support for this project, among them the Marketing team, the Advising team, and UCollege Faculty.

Thank you to all the interview candidates for your time, energy, and valued participation.

A Special thank you to Liz, Annemarie, and Heather for your invaluable teachings, enthusiasm, patience, and continuous support throughout this project. From the tangibles - schedules, interview guides, surveys, synthesis boards - to the intangibles - encouragement, relationship building with users, and team members - we felt that no stone was left unturned. We are grateful for the confidence and far-reaching skills we’ve acquired through your leadership.

Sincerely,
Carrie, Jane, Nate, Anya, and Victoria Grace